The latest buzz on the internet this morning, was a self proclaimed definitive AI exposition of Stonehenge as never seen before>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PquZ4pgZo_I

.By the time I got half way through I was answering its opening comment in my mind with – “Oh yes I beep beep did!”

It has been some time since I saw a (latest) conclusive presentation based on recent fresh research regarding an ancient site. I was at my computer, stop/starting to catch particular points made when I reached my growl! I had to stop. I was becoming angry at the gaslighting bullshit beig presented to turn minds exactly as they were claiming for the ancient builders. So blatant. So obvious, and all of this to be taken as the word of God off the back of a-n-other damned infallable AI! – and validated shamelessly on the work of legitimate archaeological researchers.

They offered logic to say that a miniturised Stonehenge model could produce the same vibrational reactions as would the imagined full sized monument. A child could see the BS in that argument. Even through computer simulation it would be impossible to represent the variables of an open air incomplete monument like this, with all the added potential earth variables.(NO echo…. gaddamn it is open air!! Not enclosed!! Duhh) But the presenters went much further. They claim a dark hidden control over anyone who stands within the monument. Such power as to suggest being watched from moving shadows, inducing panic, and ‘presence’ there leaving these hapless visitors open to ‘mind-control.’ And the final definition, that Stonehenge was not built for worship, it was built as a machine to manipulate and control the psychalogical state of visitors so they would acceed to the demands on them…. Oh yes…. “and this was just the beginning!”

Truly when you step away for a moment. Can’t you see this for the dangerous utter bullshit it is!!! It gets better…. or darker from here, if you are awake to their own description…. They claim then it was built as A Weapon!!!

OK let me stop where I originally stopped… So beyond palaeolitic times, thousands of people willingly and with free common purpose fetched huge stones from the far flung corners of the kingdom to then create this monument, incorporating multiple astronomical and planatary allignments. Then over many more years pull it about in modification; and they did it willingly knowing it was going to be used against them to control their brains and maybe make them bounce on their heads!!! Doohhh!!

Surely you see now how bloody stupid the conclusions of this presentation are, and then after this much crap have the gaul to ask YOU if you are now beginning to think that everything YOU ever knew about Stonehenge was fundamentally wrong. It is a supreme exercise in Gaslighting. We have your own discerning brain and this shameful presentation is not worth a look-in.

I can’t offer any brilliant claim or otherwise as to how the blocks of stone were moved or how they were positioned with such astronomical precission – no more than I can claim the same for the pyramids of Egypt and elsewhere. I can speculate yes! And I can observe from angles and in ways not yet adpopted – which reveal parts of the puzzle missed until now. My discipline is in the deep analysis of High or Ultra High definition photographs. I found by accident years ago that exquisitely, or photogenically composed illustrations were applied somehow to rock surfaces as a seeming memorial to what was seen or lived at the time. From samples submitted for analysis from over 8o world locations so far, the best examples concur for a process that was common more than 10,000 years ago to use rock surfaces as Walls of Record… Mostly these are faded or deteriorated from normal sight now, but they can be recovered through deep digital photographic analysis.

This is true of Stonehenge! and I follow now with some examples… They were not produced by accident. The artists originally applied them for real purpose – to memorialise or glorify. Over now to YOU. No BS…. just the photographs speaking for themselves along with your judgement as to what their purpose was. They were all lifted from the surfaces of the Stonehenge stones.Good Luck.

I hope you have fun spotting or discerning the images. PS.. I’ve been asked a few times to put the original bland surface images alongside the delineated version. I must explain that any promising surface area has to go through a tuning process with infinite variations. It is a bit like an old valve radio playing white noise… The dial is twiddled until in just one tiny position a music station plays at full strength. So it is with the analysis tools… Here are the variables listed, which you can imagine gives infinite variations. It is the reason why it can take hours to decide on the optimum image reached – to share with others. Along the way I will have found detail in several other frames which are based on a different colour frequency. This is all to say that I would have to show a whole series of picture versions for each target picture. It is more practical for the casual viewer for me to just share the best optimum frame. If anyone expressed genuine interest to get involved as a photo detective themselves I would support them fully. Here is the list of basic variables>>>> Brightness> Contrast> Midtone> Highlight> Shadow.> Depth> Colour Hue> Colour Tint> Colour Saturation> Delineation enhancement from 1 pixel + > Colour shading> Colour Masking> Always final discernment across frame variables and ruthless adopted validations… The last one is the most necessary because when a frame is challenged (and there have been many instances) it must be possible to show the route of analysis and discernment.